godream: (Default)
[personal profile] godream
Having a group of people to play Dungeons and Dragons with is really awesome.

If you rolled your eyes at that sentence, skip to the last couple paragraphs now.

However, I have discovered that in order for my life to be truly complete, I need a second group of people distinct from the first who also appreciate D&D to tell the lame (AWESOME) stories about our campaign to. Sadly I have not yet found this second group.

I do realize that "oh my god, let me tell you about this *hilarious* thing that happens in my game last night..." is in fact one of the dorkiest ways to start a story, especially when the following story is about abusing game mechanics, so I have lj-cut this part for your protection.

Ages ago, my rogue character obtained these magical boots that let you stand up as a Minor Action instead of a Move Action. I've been kind of miffed about it, because everyone else got weapons that do more damage and whatnot, much flashier.

However, as I have slowly become a sneakier person, I have realized that there are some awesome things about this. In particular, being prone gives you +2 vs ranged attacks. Which makes a certain amount of sense. As a rogue, I have almost nothing else useful to do with minor actions; and for everyone, falling down is a free action. So, when we are facing ranged attacks and few or no melee attacks, it is extremely strategically advantageous for me to fall down pretty frequently.

I find this pretty awesome and horrible and awesome. We all got a bunch of laughs out of it this evening. "Wait, and I fall down as a free action!"

I'll admit that this game does also make me want to gather friends and start running my own game, because I haven't done this since I used to play in high school with my brothers and I really forgot just how much fun it is -- cooperation and competition, luck and strategy, storytelling, joking around, getting all excited when you figure out exactly how to line up loopholes in the rules, debating and cajoling over creative answers to situations.

To take a step back -- I think part of the reason why hanging out with and joking around with smart MIT people or lots of the engineers at work is that everyone has this fundamental base of knowledge that we share and can immediately build interactions on, and the people are quick enough on their feet to immediately apply that foundation to seemingly-unrelated interactions. I think of when half of my dorm hall was taking 6.002 (intro to circuits) and we all learned about metastable states and it was the best joke and metaphor and explanation for everything for a while. I think of talking today about a coworker's food allergies (poor guy) and in rapid succession comparing it to the 12-ball problem (a common interview-type brainteaser question) and talking about it in terms of bug repro steps (and how much it sucks when one of your steps is "continue for two weeks") and debating what interactions would have to be possible for it to be an NP-hard problem. And lots of our conversations go like this -- because even though I'm ten years younger than these guys and I've only known them a few months, we all have this common foundation. In the middle of some random conversation I can make a joke about multiple inheritance or NP-completeness or collapsing waveforms and everyone will have the background to catch the reference and the brains to understand the connection, catch it and run with it, riff on it further. And because the human brain totally works on analogies, there's this immense store of patterns that we all share that we can easily use to discuss other things and very quickly cut to the interesting parts.

I'm sure this happens in other groups too, anywhere you've got smart people with common knowledge -- certainly you see it in the arts, listening to music where the composer can riff on another theme that the musically-literate will recognize the melody or harmony of, reading books by authors who like allusions is all about this (in my bus reading this morning, a pulp mystery novel, describing a mazelike government building: "Maybe if I'd had a pretty girl and a string." Which is of course a reference to Ariadne and the labyrinth of Greek mythology, and a joke and a potent illustration all in one.) It's part of what makes gaming so damn fun too -- you have this set of concepts that you're all familiar with, a common structure to play with, such that everyone understands why it's awesome when the punchline is, "And on top of all of that, he got combat advantage out of it!"

Which is all part of the joys of having common interests with people, I suppose, or even a subset of that. I suppose the conclusion is that when I go out and meet people and attempt to make friends and all that, I should lead with really dorky and absurdly specific jokes, and go straight for the people who laugh. :p

Date: 2009-03-13 05:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lania.livejournal.com
I miss playing D&D with my friends. People at Stanford are painfully non geeky and normal.

Date: 2009-03-13 02:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wumbology.livejournal.com
I have failed you. I can't think of the proper domestic abuse comment that your D&D story rightfully deserves.

As self-abasement, I promise I'll make sure Sam pays for this.

Date: 2009-03-14 04:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beat-the-beaver.livejournal.com
I second the comment re: non-geeks at Stanford. Reading this makes me miss MIT!!

Date: 2009-03-14 04:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beat-the-beaver.livejournal.com
also: is it bad if I can't remember what was so funny about metastable states? I do remember one of Sadoway's graphs being the basis of a number of jokes in freshman year though.

Date: 2009-03-16 05:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wumbology.livejournal.com
:\

Sadoway? Did his evil spread all the way to course 6?

Date: 2009-03-17 03:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godream.livejournal.com
I think it came up pretty much anytime anyone was indecisive about anything? I don't remember exactly, but I remember it being AWESOME.

Date: 2009-03-14 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lania.livejournal.com
does this mean we should start a geek club at Stanford? There are definitely enough MIT alums

Date: 2009-03-17 03:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] godream.livejournal.com
You guys totally should. :)
Also, I dunno if you guys have met in person but you are both awesome. And you both like Rent. And you both have course-6-y boys. And [livejournal.com profile] beat_the_beaver had gone the biomech route you'd both be biologists more or less (okay maybe I am stretching it at this point). And you're both wicked smart and both at Stanford. Just sayin'.

Date: 2009-03-18 12:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lania.livejournal.com
we definitely didn't meet in person. But I'd love to meet her.

And bio is the only way to go. That's what all you course 6-ers have to realize. :)

Wicked smart on my part ...?

Profile

godream: (Default)
godream

August 2010

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 09:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios